nextbigfuture.com/2018/04/mach…erstellar-propulsion.html


well, that is interesting...

Wow. thats a BOLD prediction!

it looks like its increasing a constant 4 meter per second per second acceleration.
So, the further you go, the faster you will travel!

But one question will pop up eventually..

What about breaks??

Is there any parallel/difference description with EmDrive, and interpretation relatively to MiHsC model?
I did not follow Mach effect, theory, nor experiments ....

My guess is that both effects might be related, they both have something in common.
Of course there is still no conclusive theory about the em-drive/mach effect, but you can bet they working on it.
And if they do, you might see significant improvements in the overal designs of the "propellentless" units.

Its like the invention of the lighbulb, Thomas Edison emphyrical examined all designs materials and shapes to make it happen. (Joseph Swan did build a bulb before him, but was not able to attach a power plant onto it) Once we get a proper theory for the EM drive they will also have a better design for the actual build of this device. Shawyer DID publised a new version of the EM drive, but he did not published a actually sound theory.. thats up to theoretical science.

Michael McCulloch is pushing the concept very far, in trying to use MiHsC to explain LENR too...
I'm not convinced, but if EmDrive, Mach, LENR, and darkmatter/energy had
the same origin, it would save much work for physicists.

I bet ya, thats exacly what he tries to do...

Coming up with a sort of unified theory will be a very nice addition for your resumé..