Asps PNN (Propulsione Non Newtoniana) tests which in our opinion violates action reaction principle

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Dopo aver speso miliardi di dollari in SLS, la NASA ammette che il suo razzo lunare è "inaccessibile"

      msn.com/en-us/news/other/after…-unaffordable/ar-AA1grYsB

      La Luna piena brilla sullo sfondo mentre il razzo SLS si erge in cima al Launch Complex 39B al Kennedy Space Center della NASA in Florida

      La NASA è finita sotto pressione per l'aumento del costo del suo razzo Space Launch System (SLS), che i funzionari dell'agenzia spaziale hanno finalmente
      ammesso di essere insostenibile e inaccessibile.
      ................
      L'enorme razzo lunare della NASA è stato un incubo economico. Il costo previsto di ogni razzo SLS ha superato il budget di $ 144 milioni attraverso Artemis 4, aumentando il costo complessivo di un singolo lancio Artemis ad almeno $ 4,2 miliardi, secondo un rapporto pubblicato a maggio dall'ufficio dell'ispettore generale della NASA.
      I funzionari della NASA che hanno parlato con GAO hanno riconosciuto che agli attuali livelli di costo, il programma SLS è "inaccessibile" e "insostenibile e supera ciò che i funzionari della NASA ritengono sarà disponibile per le sue missioni Artemis".

      Cambiare paradigma IDIOTI!!!

      neolegesmotus.com/2020/10/29/pnn-has-been-disclosed/
      you can learn the working principles of PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion)
      asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4
      altpropulsion.com/events/apec-…opulsion-superconductors/
      propulsion-revolution.com/

    • Musk will soon follow close in bankruptcy of rocket propulsion


      Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.


      edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/wor…oon-rocket-scn/index.html


      Change or die propulsion-revolution.com/

    • Smascherare le esilaranti truffe mediatiche sulle trombette


      Cambiamento di ciò che i media scrivono ai fini della verità in Astronautica

      Da :ilpost.it/2022/02/11/starship-elon-musk-marte/specialmente
      Nel complesso, non sono state fornite nuove informazioni sulla parte preponderante del progetto, che riguarda i viaggi verso la Luna e in seguito la colonizzazione di Marte da tempo auspicata da Musk. La mancanza di dettagli ha ricevuto diverse critiche, specialmente per quanto riguarda le future missioni lunari in cui sarà coinvolta Starship. E non è cosa da poco, visto che il progetto interessa direttamente la NASA.

      Ad aprile del 2021, la NASA aveva infatti assegnato a SpaceX un contratto da 2,9 miliardi di dollari per impiegare Starship come mezzo per il prossimo allunaggio nell’ambito del programma spaziale Artemis, avviato proprio per tornare sulla Luna con equipaggi. Il piano prevede che il nuovo allunaggio, il primo con un’astronauta, avvenga nel 2025, ma ci sono forti dubbi sul fatto che anche la NASA possa avere tutte le strumentazioni necessarie pronte per allora. La NASA deve ancora testare un altro gigantesco razzo, lo Space Launch System (SLS), che in futuro dovrà trasportare gli astronauti fino alla Luna all’interno della capsula Orion, che dovrà poi collegarsi a Starship per effettuare l’allunaggio vero e proprio.

      Ecco la traduzione NON FALSARIA

      Nel complesso, non sono state fornite nuove informazioni MA ROTFL sulla parte preponderante del progetto
      ALTRIMENTI SI CAPISCE CHE E' UNA TRUFFA :) ,
      che riguarda i viaggi verso la Luna BBBBBUUUAHHHHHHHAAAAA e in seguito la colonizzazione di Marte da tempo auspicata da Musk SI SI ULTRABBBUUUAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAA . La mancanza di dettagli ha ricevuto diverse critiche,
      PURTROPPO NON TUTTI SONO SCEMI
      :)
      ilpost.it/2022/02/11/starship-elon-musk-marte/specialmente
      per quanto riguarda le future missioni lunari in cui sarà coinvolta Starship.

      LA NASA VERSO LA LUNA NON COLONIZZERA' UN ECATZO



      E non è cosa da poco, visto che il progetto interessa direttamente la NASA.

      E SI GONZI CI PENSERA' IL CETRIOLO STARPIPPA LASKIATO SOLO A COLONIZZARE A LUNA :-))))))))

      Ad aprile del 2021, la NASA aveva infatti assegnato a SpaceX un contratto
      TRUFFA
      da 2,9 miliardi di dollari per impiegare Starship come mezzo per il prossimo allunaggio nell’ambito del programma spaziale Artemis,

      MA SE ARTRITIC E' ANDATO A CAGARE ... la STARPIPPA SEGUIRA' A RUOTA :-)))))
      avviato proprio per tornare sulla Luna con equipaggi. Il piano prevede che il nuovo allunaggio, il primo con un’astronauta, avvenga nel 2025,
      NO LA DATA PIU' SICURA E' NEL 3025 :-))))
      ma ci sono forti dubbi sul fatto che anche la NASA possa avere tutte le strumentazioni necessarie pronte per allora. La NASA deve ancora testare un altro gigantesco razzo, lo Space Launch System (SLS), che in futuro dovrà trasportare gli astronauti fino alla Luna all’interno della capsula Orion, che dovrà poi collegarsi a Starship per effettuare l’allunaggio vero e proprio.

      OPS OPS .... ANCORA NON AVETE CAPUTO CHE

      LA NASA VERSO LA LUNA NON COLONIZZERA' UN ECATZO



      E CHE IL CETRIOLONE STARPIPPA E' UNA TOTALE SO'LA MEDIATICA PER GONZI COME VOI !!!

      una prece

      Change or Die

      propulsion-revolution.com/

    • Let's reiterate why Newtonian propulsion will never colonize anything

      more than half a century ago the Nazi scientists hired by NASA understood that with the mega trumpet (FANTASTIC!) Saturn 5 on the moon you can live for about 3 days and then you have to escape to avoid dying..... because oops... oops.. You are missing 99.9999% of the mass you need to NOT CRAP.

      They tried again with only the intermediate Space Shuttle (for the purposes of a possible transport of the missing mass to survive on the Moon at least)......a rant that lasted about 30 years and killed 14 astronauts before being scrapped.
      The successors ..... either knew that it would end in the usual brutal way or not.

      I say yes that everything would have ended in skiff because the trumpet lunar projects are mainly conveyed by American presidents who are in power for 4 or 8 years.... and then whoever elected them (fools deceived with promises of failed lunar explorations and/or Martians) can also go to shit with or without accompaniment :)
      Having said that........if you want to piss on the moon for 10 days...you ALREADY have to change your horn...if you want to stay there for a YEAR! they are ultra-dicks given that there is no trumpet and THERMODYNAMICS that can do it on an economic level at least and in a certain safety for the suicide bombers on duty. :)
      And then .............who supplies the oops... oops.... the lunar base?
      If they already kappellano every now and then with supplies to the ISS which rolls at about 400 km in height.... who will bring everything necessary to the poor condemned 400,000 km away?????
      Don't tell me you'll grow potatoes and cucumbers on the Moon. :)
      Either you give up on the bullshit colonization nonsense or you genuflect to the PNN and get your butts whipped (only if women) by the legatus :)

      Change or Die
      propulsion-revolution.com/
      asps.it

    • From Nova Astronautica n.178 in www.asps.it/vol43.htm Circumnavigare Marte


      Quanto alla PNN attuale potremmo PURE decollare verso Marte con un certo set di dipoli a V.
      Ovviamente se qualcuno ci da i necessari $$$$, un kilopower da 100 Kw e 200 ingegneri come schiavi (ben pagati si intende) … :)
      ………
      In omaggio al principio molesto e politicamente scorretto che se dici la verità dovresti in anticipo prepararti un cavallo o fare l’ipocrita sistematicamente ….. ricordo che SONO STATI “ANCHE” GLI SCHIAVI CHE HANNO FATTO GRANDE ROMA.
      Schiavi che a differenza di altre civiltà potevano emanciparsi e diventare normali cittadini romani.
      …….
      Il propulsore di Baciaccia - Amundsen
      www.asps.it/maomao1.jpg
      con il nuovo scheletrato di contenimento idoneo al C2 della manovrabilità se montato su una astronave PNN a pannelli solari idonea a circumnavigare Marte.
      La PNN è esaltante contro l’imbecillità totale dei fallimenti storici dei trombettisti che con tutte le risorse che hanno e i media che controllano non colonizzano e colonizzeranno mai un ecatzo …. come si dimostra spudoratamente da oltre MEZZO SECOLO ovvero dai tempi dell’APOLLO 11 :)

    • PNN News
      IVO as many others reactionless barney devices :)
      seems to me that was created and
      is pumped by the media precisely to obscure the PNN
      propulsion-revolution.com/
      the real revolution to stop the comic rocketry
      Our prototype F432BA really a reactionless drive instead works (see our lab tests) asps.it/maomao1.jpg
      The principle seems to obscure PNN to avoid rocket market to be destroyed from PNN ( from asps.it/Vol43.htm) asps.it/mao4.jpg
      The scam against PNN... an example
      reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur/comme…_quantum_drive/?rdt=56545
      and finally was found the PNN method to fly i.e. lift off from earth surface :)

    • Chris Bergin fixed the censorship lock against PNN on February 12, 2024 :-)That is, the censorship cage in which he put PNN on NasaSpaceflightBergin's entire policy is for rocket astronautics. When he shows interest in reactionless people, he only does so if they are reactionless failures (generally the comical quantized failures). That is NOT PNN. PNN has been systematically boycotting and censoring for years.Cautiously, when he noticed that one of my posts "Non Newtonian Propulsion" propulsion-revolution.com/ in which more than 400 of his subjects had rushed to read it in just a few hours, :) HE SEEKED TO DELETE IT WITH THE WORDING:You are not allowed to search for posts in this forum. :-)The Post “NON NEWTONIAN PROPULSION” sent to Gabriel Granziera (Asps Member) was commented by Granziera as follows:“It's good news, asks you (a writer on Nasaspaceflight) to read again in another discussion on mimetic magnetism which would have to do with the PNN ;)Have you read the other thread you're referring to?"The guy is called rfmwguy
      and it is not the first time it has interfaced with the PNN on NasaSpaceflighthttps://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=40170.0You will notice that inhttps://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=73.0There are more padlocks that Bergin places than open reactionless discussions. :-)Padlocks are now divided into two main classes: box-breaking padlocks for presumed reactionless or non-functioning reactionless bankruptcy toilets (with padlock now also available at the IVO) andCENSORSHIP PADLOCKS (as it does with the PNN)Bergin being a "Guardian of conservation (Peti propulsion physics)". like the Scythian Guardians of the Revolution... fears the PNN more than the bubonic plague which is the only possibility of colonizing the Moon and Mars by scrapping the entire missile industry of which interests and failures is defender. :-)Bergin has no qualms about leaving my old discussions (without PNN know-how as before 2020) which have STILL produced thousands of counts on his meters for yearsAn update about PNN: prototypes F449 and F432Started by SergioZ82 « 1 2 3 ... 5 Next All »97 Replies54803 Views02/09/2018 12:47 amby meberbsforum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=73.50It will not be the idiot "Guardian of physical conservation" Bergin (Rocket propulsion which for over half a century has not even colonized the Moon due to thermodynamic limits) who will stop the PNN.... at least the 400 or more readers of "Non Newtonian Propulsion" for a few hours on Nasaspaceflight who do not say a word against its censorship (in order to write on NasaSpaceflight) have received the destructive link of the reactionless NOT fake:propulsion-revolution.com/After this Post Bergin will also delete more of the PNN on NasaSpaceflight in the FORUM which even has the nerve to call New Physics for Space Technology :)

    • Dei Krusty ce ne servirebbero 8 per la PNN su Marte

      Kilopower (o KRUSTY, Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling Technology) è un progetto sperimentale volto a produrre un nuovo concetto per i reattori nucleari usati nell'esplorazione spaziale[1]. Il progetto è iniziato nell'ottobre del 2015, sotto la guida della NASA e del NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration) del dipartimento per l'energia. I reattori Kilopower saranno disponibili in 4 taglie in grado di produrre da 1 a 10 kilowatt di potenza elettrica (1-10 kWe), continuamente per 12-15 anni. Il reattore a fissione utilizza l'uranio 235 per generare calore che viene trasportato ai convertitori Stirling tramite tubi di calore passivi di sodio.
      it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilopower

      Dei Krusty da 10 kilowatt ce ne servirebbero 8 … Kilopower_experiment.jpg
      4 per l’astronave PNN
      con 24 dipoli a V come questo asps.it/mao4.jpg
      e 4 da lasciare su Marte per la base PNN dal nome : “Noio siamo Noio e il resto del monto un…...”

      Astronave PNN che faccia la spola tra Terra e Marte portando le essenziali sfere di acqua
      Avrà Marte che dominerà con la PNN (cioè noio) …. ma non ci opponiamo affatto all’invasione di Marte con le trombette Artritic e/o Starpippa di Elon e/o russe , cinesi etc.. etc… …. basta che portino da soli i loro kuli su Marte

      Ovviamente con le trombette sfinteriche devono portare i loro uccelli (arrostiti da 7 mesi di viaggio) per pisciare su Marte
      Con le megatrombette (ammesso rotfl che riescano a partire ) ….pregusto già la scena :-))) della Spacecazzola di Elon in ammartaggio . Noio PNN assisteremo pregustando champagne in calici argentati.

      All’ONU e ai suoi principi del kaiser è permesso di romperci il kazzo ici con la cojonica di Barney o con le trombette di Musk ...
      se l’ONU si oppone ….. porti il suo culo su Marte con le trombette …. e venga a dircelo ici

      L’appropriazione di Marte è in base al principio preistorico: PRENDETE e vi sarà dato
      E' un fatto incontestabile che la propulsione sfinterica non si capace di mantenere un avamposto neppure sulla Luna.
      Qui la soluzione reactionless
      propulsion-revolution.com/

      E’ mia intenzione di nominare Von Ottone Governatore di Marte
      con il potere insandacabile di castrazione se per caso ammarti un gothalist asps.it/gabolas.htm
      E’ concesso a Von Ottone di utilizzare Don Fizzy come paggio o schiavo

    • Updates March 2024 from asps.it Recently at the beginning of 2024 the PNN reappeared in the Spaceflight forum due to a flaw in the censorship of Chris Bergin and his snack buddies....Bergin seeing that PNN had hundreds of links in just a few hoursreading propulsion-revolution.com/it was censored again in that forum where all the reactionless propulsion systems that don't work are ad hoc advertised.Just read what others writeIn fact Bergin encourage people to carry real scams as can be read in

      [b]https://www.reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur/comments/17xjuly/do_we_have_information_on_the_ivo_quantum_drive/?rdt=56545reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur/comme…_quantum_drive/?rdt=56545[/b]
      [b]They write : “Almost guaranteed this (IVO) is just a scam. Plenty of buzzwords & promises with exactly zero descriptions. Real projects with real promise generally don't have a problem talking about why their ish is so revolutionary. Their site looks like a low-effort scam. No information. Nothing to convince anyone whith any actual knowledge in the field or in the industry that this is worth their time or money…. “[/b]
      [b]Many time PNN was censured in [/b][b]Bergin [/b][b]spaceflight forum for the elementary problems that PNN works :-[/b][b])[/b]

      - and because they didn't do it themselves-and because it would cause the entire aerospace industry and all the crazy comedians, based on Musk's Spaceship and Artemis, to fail, thus unemploying hundreds of thousands of trumpeters all over the world.As they say in the Gospels: BY THEIR FRUITS YOU WILL RECOGNIZE THEM and in fact for over half a century since the time of Apollo 11, there has not been a permanent human outpost on the Moon given that rocketry does not have the capacity to maintain a permanent base due to physical limitations intrinsic. But undoubtedly, with the control of the media by believers in fart propulsion, a mass of morons, asses in physics, continue to believe in the comedians of Musk and Bergin of Nasaspaceflight.

    • Last Attaks against PNN


      Idiots like Chris Bergin and anonymous people like "CoolScience" (was “meberbs” ) and "edzieba" of the comic NSF site of "What metaphysics for the future of fart astronautics" are a danger to the West .
      In Bergin forum deleted the post Cervelli Rumee
      But Bergin forget that exist screenshots :) www.asps.it/antib1.png
      www.asps.it/antib2.png
      www.asps.it/antib3.png
      Moore Bergin delete suddenly this : www.asps.it/SSH34.png:-) for the fact tha PNN is the real novelty in reactionless propulsion. He deleted the world interest for PNN in the same thread “Reactionless drives history” inwww.asps.it/antib1.png
      Bergin aim is to encourage put in orbit all the reactionless (like IVO) that don’t work :) becouse his wish is that only the comic spaceship of Musk can colonize the Moon. This will never happen for thermodinamics limits PV=NkT
      Onlyreal reactionless such as PNN www.asps.it/bacam8.jpeg (Last tests in Nova Astronautica n.178 www.asps.it/vol43.htm)

      can colonize the Moon and Mars
      https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/

    • In Bergin forum Nasaspaceflight , Chris Bergin deleted the post Cervelli Rumee
      But Bergin forget that exist screenshots :)
      www.asps.it/antib1.png (before erase)
      www.asps.it/antib2.png
      www.asps.it/antib3.png
      Moore Bergin delete suddenly this : www.asps.it/SSH34.png :) for the fact tha PNN is the real novelty in reactionless propulsion. He deleted the world interest for PNN in the same thread “Reactionless drives history” in www.asps.it/antib1.png
      Bergin aim is to encourage put in orbit all the reactionless (like IVO) that don’t work :) becouse his wish is that only the comic spaceship of Musk can colonize the Moon. This will never happen for thermodinamics limits PV=NkT
      Only real reactionless such as PNN www.asps.it/bacam8.jpeg (Last tests in Nova Astronautica n.178 www.asps.it/vol43.htm )
      can colonize the Moon and Mars
      https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/


      NASA SPACEFLIGHT'S (NSF) WAR AGAINST PNN WITH
      A DOCUMENTABLE SEQUENCE OF SERIAL CENSORSHIP FOR WHICH EVIDENCE HAS RECENTLY BEEN COLLECTED AGAINST THE PNN
      OR AGAINST THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE FAILURE MISSILE

      The tests that rocket fans forget about:

      - with rockets for over half a century (1969) it has not even been possible to have a permanent human base on the Moon!

      -NASA killed 14 astronauts with the failed space shuttle that was supposed to be a reusable means of transportation!


      -that Musk's SPACESHIP has already exploded 3 times in a row in three launches.
      The control of the media subservient to the missiles has made it pass off as successes!


      SUMMARY:

      Idiots like Chris Bergin and anonymous people like "CoolScience" (was “meberbs” ) and "edzieba" of the comic NSF site of "What metaphysics for the future of fart astronautics" are a danger to the West .

      In Bergin forum deleted the post “Reactionless drives history” by Cervelli Rumee (Legatus)

      But Bergin forget that exist screenshots :) ……………………       www.asps.it


      Non-Newtonian prototypes without reaction mass ejection can be purchased after verification of their operation

      LATEST NEWS (April 6 2024)

      NASA SPACEFLIGHT'S (NSF) WAR AGAINST PNN WITH
      A DOCUMENTABLE SEQUENCE OF SERIAL CENSORSHIP FOR WHICH EVIDENCE HAS RECENTLY BEEN COLLECTED AGAINST THE PNN
      OR AGAINST THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE FAILURE MISSILE

      The tests that rocket fans forget about:

      - with rockets for over half a century (1969) it has not even been possible to have a permanent human base on the Moon!

      -NASA killed 14 astronauts with the failed space shuttle that was supposed to be a reusable means of transportation!


      -that Musk's SPACESHIP has already exploded 3 times in a row in three launches.
      The control of the media subservient to the missiles has made it pass off as successes!


      SUMMARY:

      Idiots like Chris Bergin and anonymous people like "CoolScience" (was “meberbs” ) and "edzieba" of the comic NSF site of "What metaphysics for the future of fart astronautics" are a danger to the West .

      In Bergin forum deleted the post “Reactionless drives history” by Cervelli Rumee (Legatus)

      But Bergin forget that exist screenshots :) ……………………


      www.asps.it